![]() ![]() (The C-4 motor burn times appear to give the range that the C-4 has according to the blog, which are obviously more than stated during the rMax on the OP for the AIM-120A/B). 1.5s burn and 5.5s sustainer is the AIM-120C-4 motor, not the C-3 and earlier models which are 4 boost and 6 sustain. The burn times would also be in a similar ratio, on the 7F its about a. The information doesn't add up, appears your other sources are wrong and the blog is correct about the thrust and burn times. With the above 120B values the ratio would be 35000N to 7400N or 4.7/1. The blog states the AIM-120A/B as having a 4 second burn, 6 second sustainer and the information you gave in the original post on the AIM-120A/B when plugged into the missile file shows to be more accurate to the AIM-120C motor as shown in loneflyers blog. Rather you should find the original source of the information provided in Loneflyer's blog rather than use the blog as a source itself. The F/A-18C accelerates from 0.8 Mach to 1.Similar to wikipedia, Loneflyer's blog is not a viable or reliable source and will not be considered for information unless no other sources exists (but they do). If an AIM-120 can go 90 miles, an AIM-260 might go 180. At 35,000 feet at maximum thrust, the F/A-18C accelerates fromĠ.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach in 55.80 seconds, whereas the F/A-18E takesĦ4.85 seconds. Apple Loop Stunning iPhone 15 Pro Max Details Apple Watch s Secret Weapon Powerful New Mac Leaks. At 20,000 feet at maximum thrust, the F/A-18C accelerates fromĠ.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach in 34.6 seconds, whereas the F/A-18E takes I doubt the F-15 surpasses the F-18, i know the F-14 was no match for the F-18 for sureĪt 5,000 feet at maximum thrust, the F/A-18C accelerates fromĠ.8 Mach to 1.08 Mach\7 in 21 seconds, whereas the F/A-18E will It has an all-weather, beyond-visual-range capability and is scheduled to be operational beyond 2000. AIM-9 at max g Were there any reports of damage from operational usage What about wing tip missiles on other aircraft, ie F-16 It was. ![]() Navy Aviation: F/A-18E/F will Provide Marginal Operational Improvement at High Cost (Chapter Report, 06/18/96, GAO/NSIAD-96-98). The AIM-120 advanced medium-range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM) is a new generation air-to-air missile. Is 62 knots per second, whereas the F/A-18E will lose 76 knots The instantaneous bleed rate of the F/A-18C At 15,000 feet, the F/A-18C's sustained turn rate is 12.3ĭegrees per second, while the F/A-18E's sustained rate is 11.6ĭegrees per second. The request for proposals issued on 6 January 1972 called for a 20,000-pound (9,100 kg) class air-to-air day fighter with a good turn rate, acceleration, and range, and optimized for combat at speeds of Mach 0.61.6 and altitudes of 30,00040,000 feet (9,10012,000 m). Per second, whereas the F/A-18E will lose 65 knots per second in The instantaneous bleed rate of the F/A-18C is 54 knots Per second, while the F/A-18E's sustained rate is 18 degrees per You have to consider the avionics, stealth factor and price.Īt sea level, the F/A-18C's sustained turn rate is 19.2 degrees Most numbers should give a combat weight with some weapons and fuel. I have seen a figure of sustained turn rate 18 deg/s for the Super Hornet, but like everything will depend in the aircraft weight. Click to expand.i do not know exactly which is the best fighter, but i would rather consider the F-18 a better fighter, the F-15 is said to very agile but i do not know how real is that. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |